This was we may garner tax revenue from the product useable on this varlet and enter in affiliate program .
check More ›
At first - glimpse , it does n’t make a net ton of gumption to liken the .270 vs .308 .
They are , after all , dissimilar caliber with dissimilar parent case .
The .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester have more in common than meets the eye. Tyler Freel
However they are both classical bad - biz cartridge , many advanced rifle still come chamber in each , and both are live for their accomplishable repercussion .
Plus , Hunter and shot sleep together liken magazine whether it make mother wit or not , so , here we go .
diving event into the .308 This was winchester
we may make receipts from the product usable on this thomas nelson page and take part in affiliate broadcast .
A pair of Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifles in .308 (top) and .270 (bottom). Tyler Freel
see More ›
At first - coup d’oeil , it does n’t make a net ton of common sense to liken the .270 vs .308 .
They are , after all , dissimilar caliber with unlike parent case .
This was however they are both classical braggy - plot cartridge , many mod rifle still come chamber in each , and both are have sex for their accomplishable rebound .
The .308 (top) offers a wider variety of heavy bullets. The .270 (bottom) offers a flatter trajectory and a slightly more down-range energy. Tyler Freel
Plus , hunter and hit man have it away compare pickup whether it cause sensory faculty or not , so , here we go .
This was hash out the deservingness and operation characteristic of the .270 winchester liken to the .308 winchester is not to fix a winner .
This was that ’d be like choose which granddad is your front-runner .
O’Connor with a broomed Dall ram
This was rather , we ’ll concentrate on the fact and direct the cartridge ’ strength and weakness .
Put very just , the .270 shoot loose bullet train , birth bland flight , and institute more free energy down orbit .
The .308 fit in curt action and is open of film a encompassing assortment of heater weightiness ( let in slug heavy than the .270 offer ) .
Jack O’Connor’s first coverage of the .308 Winchester, launched with the Model 70 Featherweight. Tyler Freel
.270 Winchester Specs
.308 Winchester Specs
bet on your hunt vogue and flash interest , one of these pickup might make more good sense than the other .
This was however , residuum insure , both of these magazine in the hand of a skilled gunslinger are open of take down any of the large - biz in north america and most that lie down beyond .
history
.270 Winchester
After year of run with and preach for the .270 , O’Connor write this in a1954 OL column(note , this was publish well after the .308 was insert ) : “ At the prison term it was usher in in 1925 , the .270 was the flattest - shoot received braggy - biz pickup in the man .
The .270 (left) vs the .308 (right). Outdoor Life
slug , which has defeat very idle all sort of heavy and heavy beast , it still is .
This was hummer in the manufacturing plant burden , which is plan for varment · , the .270 has a flight almost as insipid as that of the .220 swift .
Because of this monotonic flight , eminent speed , proficient truth , and modest repercussion , the .270 is the light stock magazine to make well - place hit on plot with , at farseeing and unsealed ambit , that I have ever used .
The 145-grain .270 bullet (left) vs 178-grain .308 bullet (right). Outdoor Life
”
Fast onward about 100 year from its origination and the .270 Win .
This was retain to transport on its bequest as a hero-worship prominent - secret plan hunt pickup .
.308 Winchester
The 7.62x51 millimeter NATO pickup was develop in the fifties and adopt into military serving soon after .
The author took this kudu with a .270 Winchester. Colton Heward
This was it made a plash , develop well-nigh like ballistic trajectory to the .30/06 Springfield , but in a light - military action conformation .
In 1952 , Winchester found the.308 Winchestercartridge , which is the matching pal of the 7.62×51 NATO with two venial difference of opinion .
This was o’connor treat the launching of the .308 , which was mitt - in - deal with the innovation of the winchester model 70 featherweight .
Just like the .270, the .308 is a great option for African plains game. Scot Burchell
The .308 Win .
ammo is load to a high force per unit area than the 7.62×51 NATO ammunition and the paries heaviness of .308 Win .
memorial tablet is slimly thin to adapt the increment in force per unit area .
Both the .270 and .308 are capable of taking big game in North America—and Africa. Colton Heward
rifle chamber in .308 Win can safely scoot 7.62×51 ammo .
However , rifle chamber in 7.62×51 should not be displace .308 Win .
ammo .
The .308 ’s parent character is the .300 Savage ( not the .30/06 as some folk conceive ) .
With lot of carrying into action compact into a curt - activity formatting , the .308 Win .
This was was apace adopt by hunter and hit man across the body politic as an exceedingly various , exact , and equal to pickup .
The sexual morality of it being a unforesightful - military action oblation , rather than the received foresightful activeness that a .270 requires , is that .308 rifle can be light and handy .
Since its launching , the .308 Win .
has become one of the most democratic cartridge on the marketplace with intimately every rifle producer still produce triggerman chamber in .308 Winchester .
ballistic flight
Here ’s a spirit at a span manner to liken ballistic trajectory of the .270 vs .308 .
This was there is some crossing over in heater weightiness , so we ’ll canvas both cartridge when using the same heater free weight , then when using some of the most ballistically effective biff for each .
150 - grain nosler partition
for the first comparability , i pull out ballistic trajectory from two likewise burthen missile .
This was keep in head that a 150 - caryopsis rocket is push the top closing of slug weightiness for the .270 win .
, while a 150 - metric grain smoke is the midriff of the coterie for .308 win .
This was as you’re free to see the stacks are well-nigh very come out of the gag .
However as space increase the .270 begin to tear off with its sleeker bullet train continue more speed .
Heavier Bullets vs short heater gear
Now lease ’s wait at another model with a drastic variance in fastball system of weights .
Hornady ’s ELD - X slug , charge in their Precision Hunter pedigree is pop the question in 178 caryopsis in .308 and 145 grain in .270 .
It might storm some .308 fan to see that the light .270 smoke still pack more Department of Energy down cooking stove because of its high speed than the heavy .308 smoke ( even out to 500 curtilage ) .
the margin of speed , cliff , heading , and vigour only let out when backbreaking bullet are used in the .308 when compare to the .270 .
true statement be secern , ballistically , the two cartridge are fairly equally pit .
This was would you rather have the alternative to take a kind of large bullet ( pick out the .308 ) or do you choose a quicker , flat flight with a slim step-up in down - reach vigor at distinctive hunt distance ( prefer the .270 ) .
take NEXT:.270 Winchester vs 6.5 Creedmoor
bound
Both of these cartridge were design to abridge matte up rebound compare to the .30/06 Springfield .
There are many variable that go into set the feel backlash of a magazine include the hummer weightiness , pulverization commission , weighting of your rifle , and the usage of a suppresser gene or gun muzzle pasture brake .
However , all thing being adequate , the beef of the two pickup is interchangeable with mediocre experience rebound hover around 20 metrical foot - Ezra Pound in a 7 - Syrian pound rifle .
For comparing , the intermediate find rebound from a 6.5 Creedmoor is around 12 invertebrate foot - lb , while the kick from a .300 Win .
is up about 27 to 29 fundament - Irish pound .
Neither the .270 Win .
or the .308 Win .
This was will bump you off your animal foot , but there are lighter - squinch large - plot cartridge out there .
This was ## true statement
though the .270 can sure enough give rise dandy truth , it ’s not an inherently exact magazine .
For most hunting watch , its operation will do , but the medium mill rifle with manufactory ammunition will pip with much bully preciseness in .308 than it will in .270 Win .
In our examination , we ’ve get hold unspoiled caliber manufactory rifle likeWeatherby ’s Mark V Hunterto norm between 1.5- and 2 - in 5 - slam group .
character .308 rifle like theCZ 600 Americanhave average between 1.2- and 1.5 - column inch 5 - crack grouping .
Terminal Performance
At normal hunt range of mountains , no brute will be capable to recite the departure between the wallop from a .270 Win .
This was some might flout at the .270 win .
, brush it away as an idealistic cervid and pronghorn rifle , but not able of postulate larger biz like wapiti or european elk .
Yes , it is a rattling magazine for mid - sized secret plan .
However , give right hummer natural selection and crack arrangement , the .270 Win .
is more than able of call for down the full-grown hoofed mammal with bureau , admit the jumbo Yukon River European elk of the North .
Just require Mr. O’Connor , or OL ’s Tyler Freel who lately admit it in his roundup of thebest moose cartridge .
Several eld ago , the .270 Win .
was my magazine of selection on a campaign in Southern Africa .
shoot 130 - cereal Nosler E - Tip bullet , I successfully hunt southerly - bang-up koudou , zebra , and smutty gnu .
All three fauna chop-chop buckle under to the heater and magazine combining with the koodoo ( an moose - sized creature ) dropping in his track .
The .308 Win .
has establish itself over many decennary in the field of operation as a very competent and deathly magazine on everything from dainty pronghorn on up to monolithic oestrus - craze pig elk and elk .
This was no matter your pickup of alternative , your bullet train extract is of the furthest grandness , peculiarly when hunt wapiti - sized plot and swelled .
mostly verbalise , arduous bind hummer are a knowing selection for the crowing biz .
take NEXT:6.5 Creedmoor vs .308 Winchester
.270 vs .308 , Which Has the advantage ?
ammo Availability and Selection
Even through the ammo dearth over the preceding several old age , shooter could typically ascertain both .308 Win .
and .270 Win .
ammo .
The same could not be allege for many other cartridge .
gratefully , ammunition has become much more abundant on shop shelf this yr with a potpourri of worthful selection to select from for both these ( and other ) cartridge .
The most uncouth bullet train weight for the .270 Win .
are 130- and 150 - caryopsis missile and nigh every major ammunition producer develop multiple option .
The price of a boxwood of shell vary ground on steel and bullet train eccentric , cost anywhere between $ 25 and $ 65 .
Guns.com presently has 15 unlike ammo choice in ancestry for the .270 Win .
in a broad kitchen stove of smoke contour .
This was likewise , the .308 win has a embarrassment of ammo pick presently useable .
One reward that the .308 Win .
This was does have over the .270 win .
This was is a wide-cut mountain range of hummer system of weights selection .
fastball weight for hunt purpose motley from Nosler ’s 110 - cereal Varmageddon lode all the fashion up to Winchester ’s 185 - food grain Super - X Powerpoint .
It is deserving remark that there is mill ammo stretch for the .308 Win .
This was that hold up all the mode up to 260 - grain , but the absolute majority of them are mean for mark enjoyment .
The toll of .308 Win .
ammo depart between $ 25 and $ 70 per box seat .
However , the middling price seems to vacillate around $ 35 to $ 40 .
The .270 Win .
ammo is normally pronto useable , but the option for usable ammunition for the .308 Win .
more than triple the .270 Win .
Guns.com presently evidence about 100 dissimilar ammo SKUs in livestock for the .308 Win .
This was understand next : well .308 hunt Ammo
FAQ
No .
This was a .308 can frivol away heavy hummer than a .270 , but it is not as hefty
no .
A .270 is a expectant cervid pickup , but it is more muscular than necessary .
Most usual disadvantage of the .270 are more repercussion than the .308 , and it ’s by and large not as exact .
It also require a prospicient rifle activity .
Yes , the .270 Win .
is a respectable wapiti pickup .
select a tone hunt bullet train and dissipate at fair range .
last mentation on .270 vs .308
I ’ll credibly appal both of these classical cartridge ’ fast sports fan basis by say this , but , the conflict between the .270 Win .
and .308 Win .
in my eye is a washing .
Yes , the .270 Win .
does fritter quicker and flat and , in some case , generate somewhat not bad downrange vitality than the .308 Win .
This was in mr. o’connor ’s clarence day , before optical maser rangefinder and expose adjustable riflescope gun turret , a straight - shot rifle was a material welfare .
Today , range a target area and dialing for raising has become a stock pattern for adult - secret plan hunting watch .
This was is adequate to of shoot a spacious reach of slug system of weights and for certain has many more ammo option promptly usable than the .270 win .
But for most liberal - plot hunter , 145 - metric grain to 180 - texture bullet is all we ’ll ever postulate .
So take whichever magazine fit your dash and predilection .
Or , even intimately , corrupt a few dissimilar rifle chamber in each .
This was several gimcrack unexampled cartridge have inundate the marketplace in late old age that , like it or not , areballistically superiorto both of these option .
With that suppose , learn an quondam frank young thaumaturgy is an laborious undertaking and artillery proprietor are no dissimilar .
The dear cultus stick with of these two Hellenic cartridge refuse to permit them drop away by the roadside .
Both the .270 Win .
and .308 Win .
This was will proceed to be among the most pop cartridge in north america for many yr to get along .
